Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 16 August 1996:
Vol. 273. no. 5277, pp. 864 - 866
DOI: 10.1126/science.273.5277.864
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

News

Richard A. Kerr

The announcement on 7 August that a team of researchers had found traces of what might be ancient microbes in a chunk of Martian rock raised the curtain on what is likely to be a long, contentious debate. As the researchers explain in a report published in this issue of Science (p. 924) no one line of evidence requires their dramatic conclusion that minute bacteria flourished on Mars billions of years ago, when it may have been a wetter and more hospitable place. But they say that taken together, the three different minerals, an organic residue, and bacteria-like structures found in a meteorite that was blasted from the surface of Mars strongly suggest ancient life. Many other scientists, however, think inorganic processes could easily explain the clues.

Read the Full Text

To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)