Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 20 September 1996:
Vol. 273. no. 5282, pp. 1648 - 1650
DOI: 10.1126/science.273.5282.1648
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

News & Comment

Marcia Barinaga

Efforts to restore rivers damaged by diversion of their waters to agriculture and cities have mostly focused on optimizing habitats for a single fish species, such as the salmon. But plans proposed for Northern California's Trinity River and the streams feeding Mono Lake, also in California, take a more radical tack: They aim to restore the physical processes, including floods, that help a river shape its banks and bottoms. Proponents maintain that restoring natural habitats will also restore fisheries. The idea is controversial, however. The higher flows needed will take water away from agricultural and urban users, and even some ecologists question whether the approach will indeed increase fish numbers. The dispute is far from academic, for the Trinity River and Mono Lake projects may well provide models for restoration of other damaged rivers.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
A critical review of catchment-scale stream rehabilitation programmes.
M. Hillman and G. Brierley (2005)
Progress in Physical Geography 29, 50-76
   Abstract »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)